Beshak
Turning an existing content engine into a lead engine
Beshak already had a trusted educational library pulling tens of thousands of organic visits a month. The constraint was conversion and measurement, not more traffic. The programme built technical SEO, indexation and event tracking first, then used that visibility to lift branded-search leads 33% from March to May.
- Industry
- Insurtech / insurance advisory
- Services
- SEO · SEO Audit · Technical SEO · Conversion Tracking
Beshak
Turning an existing content engine into a lead engine
Build
Overview
Project overview
Beshak already had a trusted educational library pulling tens of thousands of organic visits a month. The constraint was conversion and measurement, not more traffic. The programme built technical SEO, indexation and event tracking first, then used that visibility to lift branded-search leads 33% from March to May.
Objectives
- Make high-value pages crawlable and indexable instead of leaving thousands of compare URLs invisible.
- Install event tracking so visit, CTA click and lead submit could be read as a funnel.
- Improve click-through and conversion on pages that already had traffic.
- Give the team a live view of lead delivery against target, not a quarterly surprise.
Challenge
The constraint
About 45,000 monthly visitors were arriving, but conversion lagged the category. A working benchmark against competitor Ditto suggested Beshak was converting visitors to leads at a fraction of a comparable platform, even though content depth and traffic volume were competitive. Roughly 13,000 pages had never been technically audited. Only 194 of about 9,984 compare pages were indexed. High-traffic content pages used generic CTAs that did not match the reader's decision stage. There was no confirmed event tracking, so drop-off between landing and lead submit was invisible. Average click-through on search impressions sat around 0.7 to 1%.
Context
Constraints around the work
Beshak (beshak.org) is an independent, research-led insurance advisory platform. It had built something most insurance sites in India had not: a large educational content base that brought traffic without paid distribution or commission-driven sales tactics. Without fixing the technical and measurement layer first, any conversion work would have been guesswork.
Approach
How the work was sequenced
01
Technical foundation
Full site crawl and audit of 100 priority pages. Fixed 404s, canonical tags and redirect chains. Mixpanel event tracking began for CTA clicks, form submissions and scroll depth.
02
Visibility and signals
FAQ schema on 15 top article and forum pages, star-rating schema on 10 insurer product pages, validated in Google's Rich Results Test. Keyword research on underperforming pages. Mixpanel funnel reports for visit to CTA click to lead submit, segmented by page type.
03
Content, CTR and recovery
On-page work on 15 priority pages, internal linking, refreshed articles and meta rewrites on high-impression URLs. Core Web Vitals and backlink audit continued. The new tracking is what surfaced the April lead dip and made the May recovery visible inside the same quarter.
Decisions
Key decisions
Do not redesign CTAs before the funnel can be seen
Conversion work without event tracking would have been decoration. Measurement shipped before CRO experiments.
Indexation before more content
Thousands of compare pages were already written and invisible. Making existing URLs eligible for search was higher leverage than publishing more articles into the same hole.
Solution
What we put in place
Growth was treated as a stack: technical SEO health, then visibility and indexing, then measurement, then conversion work. The sequence started with a crawl and cleanup of crawl errors, redirects, canonicals and non-indexed content. On-page fixes followed on the pages carrying the most traffic and commercial intent. Analytics and event tracking (GA4, Search Console, Tag Manager, Mixpanel, Clarity) went in so later decisions could be measured. FAQ and star-rating schema went onto top article and insurer pages. Keyword work targeted URLs stuck just outside page one. A backlink and Core Web Vitals review protected the domain while the funnel became visible.
Deliverables
What shipped
- Technical audit and cleanup across priority pages
- On-page SEO on the highest-traffic commercial URLs
- GA4, Search Console, Tag Manager, Mixpanel and Clarity instrumentation
- Visit to CTA to lead funnel reporting by page type
- FAQ and star-rating schema on priority article and insurer pages
- Keyword research and content optimisation for near-page-one URLs
- Core Web Vitals review and backlink audit with a disavow file in preparation
Outcome
What changed
Target-based lead tracking is now in place across acquisition channels, so the team can see a shortfall in the same month it appears. Google Brand leads, the channel most directly influenced by the SEO and CTR work, moved from 467 in March to 452 in April to 620 in May: 33% growth from March to May. Overall lead delivery against target was 95.6% in March (2,201 against 2,303), dipped to 82.6% in April (1,925 against 2,330), and recovered to 94.4% in May (2,266 against 2,400). The April dip is exactly what the new infrastructure was built to catch. The engagement is ongoing. Funnel drop-off analysis, heatmap-driven UX work and a structured CRO programme are the next phase.
Verified metrics
Measured change
33%
Branded search lead growth
Google Brand leads from 467 in March to 620 in May, tracking with the schema, CTR and on-page work in that window.
Client lead reporting, March to May.
620
May branded-search leads
Up from 467 in March and 452 in April on the channel most exposed to the SEO and CTR work.
Client lead reporting.
94.4%
May delivery against target
Recovered from 82.6% in April (1,925 against a 2,330 target) to 2,266 leads against a 2,400 May target.
Client lead reporting versus agreed monthly targets.
Related
Related services and markets
Next study
Cutting cost per booking by replacing broker dependency
A Noida residential launch needed qualified buyers without repeating a broker-only sales pattern. A four-week demand system (search, Meta Reels, creators, and WhatsApp/email nurture) produced 12 bookings worth Rs 14.2 Cr at Rs 3.75L cost per booking, against a broker baseline of Rs 6-8L, and left the developer with an owned buyer database.
Next move
If traffic is already there and leads are not, start with the measurement layer.
Pixoflix SEO and conversion work begins with what is indexed, what is tracked and which pages already carry intent.
